πŸ“Š Comparison Table: Share vs NTFS Permissions vs Security

Feature / AspectShare PermissionsNTFS PermissionsSecurity Settings (ACLs)
πŸ“ Where ConfiguredSharing tab β†’ Advanced SharingSecurity tabSecurity tab β†’ Advanced
πŸ”— Applies ToAccess over the network (SMB/UNC paths)Access over local + networkFull NTFS model incl. permissions, ownership, audit
πŸ‘₯ User ScopeUsers/groups accessing over networkUsers/groups both local and domainUsers/groups + audit subjects
βš™οΈ Common Settings– Read
– Change
– Full Control
– Read
– Write
– Modify
– Full Control
– Permissions
– Ownership
– Auditing
πŸ” GranularityBasic (3 levels)Highly granular (individual file/folder level)Most granular (includes inheritance, audit, owner)
πŸ›‘ Effective Access RuleMost restrictive applies when combined w/ NTFSMost restrictive applies when combined w/ shareDepends on entire ACL evaluation
🧰 Tools UsedFile Explorer, net shareFile Explorer, icacls, Get-Acl, Set-AclSame as NTFS + advanced UI
πŸ§ͺ Audit Support❌ Not supportedβœ… Supported via ACLβœ… Includes full auditing setup
πŸ“ Inheritance Support❌ No inheritanceβœ… Supports inheritance from parent folderβœ… Supports inheritance + advanced rules
πŸ” Visibility Control❌ Cannot hide objects from unauthorized usersβœ… With ABE + NTFS permissionsβœ… With ABE + NTFS
🧯 Fallback When MissingNo access via network if not sharedNo access at all if NTFS deniesNTFS security model is always enforced
🧠 Best PracticeSet to Full Control for allowed groups, manage access with NTFSUse NTFS to define actual access rightsUse to set ownership, audit policies, inheritance

🧠 Thumb Rule

“Give Full Control in Share Permissions, and restrict access using NTFS Permissions for precision. Use Security (ACLs) for advanced control and auditing.”